Thursday, January 24, 2008

How To Make A Ghostbusters Proton Pack



Anche in questo caso si ripresenta la stessa questione di American Gangster , visto la sera prima di Lussuria . Nel momento in cui vado al cinema a vedere un film che è stato premiato con il Leone d'oro a Venezia, mi creo delle aspettative abbastanza elevate. Tra l'altro, visto che comunque verrò malgiudicato per questo post, preciso subito che a me Ang Lee piace, in alcuni casi anche parecchio. This time, however, did not have it done.
During the occupation of China by Japan, Wong Chia Chi (Tang Wei) is being drawn into the ranks of the resistance by the friends of the opera house company. Then pretends to be Mrs. Mak to hit Mr. Yee (Tony Leung), a man at the top of the collaborationist government. To gain the trust of its goal, the young actress takes advantage of the irresistible attraction that Mr. Yee feels for her, but ending up hopelessly involved in the consequences of his actions.
erotic drama with shades and historical-political reality in Lust is not in full any of the above premises. As drama it lacks the passion necessary so that even the sex scenes, as explicit (or perhaps because of it) seem to turn just for the sake of doing so. The historical context is well then leave them out, without any deeper than two corpses thrown into the ground. Mahjong will also be a good game, but after ten scenes of ladies who spend their time playing, it begins to simmer. It must be said, however, that Ang Lee knows his job done, as in the past has done much, much better, and that's why the bottom Lust remains a successful movie in half, that accuracy is half of the acting of Tony Leung. For the rest of little else and diluted in a long time, with the risk of boring the viewer, che pochi giorni dopo si dimenticherà ciò che ha visto.

Voto: 6 / 10

Tuesday, January 22, 2008

Art And Science Bedside

American Gangster

Nel momento in cui si decide di pubblicizzare un film presentandolo come "epico, ai livelli de Il padrino", chiunque si rende conto che si sta già cercando di ingannarlo. Insomma, un film potrà anche essere bello, anche molto bello, ma paragonarlo con uno dei film che ha fatto la storia del cinema non gioverà certo alla sua immagine, senza contare che si corre il rischio di deludere inevitabilmente le aspettative (esagerate) degli spettatori. Quindi tu, che hai ideato la campagna promozionale di American Gangster , sei pregato di cambiare lavoro.
Nella New York dei primi 70, after being for years the right arm of a boss in Harlem, Frank Lucas (Denzel Washington) decides to set up his own criminal organization, relying on the selling of pure heroin, imported directly from Bangkok by air traffic of 'U.S. Army. Richie Roberts (Russell Crowe) is a narcotics cop, corrupt ostracized by colleagues and abandoned by his frustrated wife. The first is a man of "strong principles", the other is an immoral, there are two trains running in opposite directions, and that will come into conflict with no possibility of mediation.
Ridley Scott returns to a genre most congenial to him after the misstep of A Good Year, continuing to run with his favorite actor Russell Crowe. The great Australian actor's interpretation, supported the other as good Denzel Washington, but not enough to make American Gangster the masterpiece that the director wanted. In other words, was bitten off a little more chew. As regards the form, I think the story of two parallel stories is a bit 'too cumbersome, while the content of the film I would say that some potentially explosive issues such as the spread of heroin could be addressed with more depth, or at least a eye a bit 'more critical. What he shot Scott, a far cry from the masterpieces of Coppola, Scorsese and Lumet is a solid film, well done, but that certainly will not enter into history. In fact, Lucas is not Corleone, and Roberts is not Serpico. Promotional campaign aside, we expected something more.

Rating: 7 / 10